Women in the military

Women will now be permitted to serve in combat roles in the military. I think this is a good thing even though, in an ideal world, the very concept of a military should be unnecessary. Solving problems by shooting at people and blowing them up is stupid.

But I’d like focus here on two objections to women in combat raised by Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, in interviews with CNN.

First, she claims that women don’t want to serve in combat roles. This is a terrible argument. If women really don’t want to take part in combat – if not a single woman is interested – then what possible harm could opening up combat roles to women have? We don’t currently have a draught in the United States, so it’s not as if the military is forcing women to conscript.

Donnelly’s second argument is that putting women in combat battalions puts them at greater risk of sexual harassment. Again, a terrible argument. What she is implying is that men, instead of being held accountable for their behavior around women, should be allowed to simply put women out of sight and out of mind.

What Donnelly is arguing for is therefore no different to the sort of misogynistic exclusion of women seen in Arab countries like Saudi Arabia where men, unsure of whether they can function in the presence of women, choose instead to bundle women up and shut them behind closed doors.

The solution to sexual harassment issues is to teach men how to behave properly, not to keep the sexes separate.

So I think Donnelly, and others objecting to women in combat roles, need to come up with better arguments. In the meantime, I welcome the new ruling, as do many women who will soon be making a trip to the recruitment office.


3 Responses to Women in the military

  1. L.Long says:

    at greater risk of sexual harassment….
    maybe verbally, cuz men are pigs. But physically?? Ever try to take advantage of a woman who is carrying a gun and knows how to use it?? And a woman trained to fight takes away the size/strength advantage of men in normal conditions.

  2. Keith says:


    You are probably right: I doubt if sexual harassment is likely to take place during combat missions, since the imperative to stay alive overwhelms everything else. There is, however, a problem with sexual harassment elsewhere in the military, something that is hopefully being tackled with every resource at the military’s disposal.

  3. L.Long says:

    And there is another problem with my post above.
    The word ‘military’, it has a very wide meaning.
    As I do not consider most of the people in the AirForce as ‘military’.
    I was in the USAF for 20yrs and only saw a gun once except when visiting civilians. The most dangerous thing I saw was getting shocked by electronic gear or VD from unprotected sex.
    Everyone I saw injured were on the football team.
    But by the same token harassment would have to be very covert as the lab conditions put everyone in sight of everyone else.
    So I still standby what I said earlier, if a girl is trained to defend herself the attitude she puts out says not to mess with her. Harassers like rapists look for the ‘victim’ type. And yes I have seen many of the ‘I’m a victim’ type both male & female and training them in self-defense is almost a waste of time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: