Harry “Jesus” Potter

Spoiler alert: This article contains information about events in the last Harry Potter movie.

In the desperately named “Relevant” magazine for Christians, is an article about Harry Potter. Apparently, the Harry Potter series is drenched in Christian symbolism and values.

Take, for instance, support for the oppressed, or the emphasis on deep bonds of friendship and community, and sacrificial love. All values born of the Christian tradition, right? Right. This kind of thing annoys me no end. How arrogant must Christians be to think that these fundamentally human, and extremely ancient (pre-Christian) concepts belong to them? It boggles the mind. Christianity may certainly have done well by adopting some of the good moral ideas that were available to it at the time, but it cannot lay claim to these ideas as its own.  But that is the nature of religious traditions: they boldly proclaim to have invented the universe and everything in it. Ironic that such a sweeping view of the world is born of such acute factual myopia.

The article in “Relevant” (we really are relevant, honest!) goes on to discuss events in the final installment of the Harry Potter movie series. Harry dies and goes to a place called “King’s Cross” (the author of the article nearly swoons at this religious reference), where he is counselled by a very god-like Dumbledore before coming back to life and slaying Voldemort (Satan, presumably).

This scene is, indeed, quite reminiscent of the resurrection story in the New Testament. There is, however, one very important change. In the Harry Potter movies, the need for Harry to die and then return to life and slay Voldemort is brought on by circumstances (and magic) beyond anyone’s control, including Dumbledore’s.

This makes all the difference. It is one thing to sacrifice one’s life for people when circumstances leave you no other way of helping them. It is quite another when someone deliberately sets the entire thing up, and refuses to change his mind and relax his rules unless someone dies. The God of the Bible does just this: instead of forgiving us for our sins in a straightforward manner, he insists that someone die to pay the price of these sins. He is a jealous, just God, and will extract every drop of blood due to him. Jesus is, essentially, held hostage: if he wants to save mankind, he will have to die in order to do it. (I could add the confusing element that Jesus and God are supposed to be of one mind, but why further muddy a perfectly bad theology?)

The Harry Potter story has no such central, controlling figure who insists on sacrifice while simultaneously claiming to be compassionate and merciful. This is what makes the Harry Potter story line morally tenable, and the Bible story morally shameful.

Advertisements

4 Responses to Harry “Jesus” Potter

  1. RuediG says:

    It may be annoying, but Christians would point out that Yahweh predates most anything. He created a certain world, with certain mechanisms, and people who live in that world. No wonder they guessed at much of what was in His mind, even before Christ.

    As for literary allusions, you might like another article better – http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2011/july/harryherestay.html (I hope you do – I’m not trying to annoy you even more… 🙂

    • kpharri says:

      Ruedi, thanks for the comment. My annoyance actually encompasses the claim that Yahweh created everything: it is a claim made without any evidence, let alone the extraordinary evidence required of such a claim, and gives believers license to claim anything and everything as the provenance of their god.

      • RuediG says:

        Yes it does. But then again, believers aren’t necessarily out there looking for “license to claim”; seeing everything as the provenance of God may be more of a conclusion “if x, then y.” That’s of course not addressing the issue of evidence for anything.

        • kpharri says:

          The very problem is that believers aren’t properly establishing the validity of their claims but instead building everything on presuppositions they’ve never checked. It is obvious to the rest of us that they are basing their claims on pure fantasy, which is why these claims come across as both ill informed and arrogant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: